4.1 C
New York
Thursday, February 27, 2020
Home Opinion ACT Column The murderer of Zhang Yingying was sentenced to life imprisonment. Why did...

The murderer of Zhang Yingying was sentenced to life imprisonment. Why did he escape the death penalty?

On Thursday, after the jury was unable to reach an agreement on whether to impose a death sentence, Zhang Yingying’s defendant, Brend Christensen, was sentenced to life imprisonment. On June 9, 2017, Zhang Yingying disappeared after a black car near the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The defendant has not revealed the whereabouts of Zhang Yingying’s body.

A jury in the US District Court for the District of Peoria, Illinois, ruled last month that 29-year-old Christensen was charged with the murder of Zhang Yingying’s series. The same jury consisting of five women and seven men then entered the sentencing phase.

Christensen

Zhang Yingying, 26, is a visiting scholar at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Life imprisonment, no parole

The jury told the judge on Thursday that they could not agree on life imprisonment or the death penalty, and that the defendant was in life imprisonment and could not be commuted or released on parole.

When Federal District Judge James Shadid read the sentencing verdict, Christensen lowered his head and closed his head, smiling and sighing. A member of the legal team of Christensen embraced his mother. Christensen embraced and thanked his lawyer.

Although the state of Illinois has abolished the death penalty, the case is a federal case under the US Kidnapping Act and can still be sentenced to death.

During the end of the sentencing phase on Wednesday, the prosecutor described how Christensen took Zhang Yingying to his apartment with his own policeman, and raped her there, then hit her with a baseball bat. And beheaded her.

Three days after the murder, the former Ph.D. student at the University of Illinois purchased a sewer dredging agent and a garbage bag. The use of these items is not known at this time. The defendant has never revealed the whereabouts of Zhang Yingying’s body.

Christensen’s team of lawyers admitted that their client had killed Zhang Yingying after the trial, but asked the jury to consider the defendant’s lack of criminal record, alcoholism, drug abuse and mental problems.

The death penalty must be made by the jury

Cheng Shaoming, a member of the American Bar Association and a well-known Chinese criminal case defense lawyer, told VOA that US federal law stipulates that sentencing judgments involving the death penalty must be made by a jury rather than a judge. Only 12 jurors can unanimously determine that the offender can be sentenced to death.

“The biggest problem with Zhang Yingying’s case is that two of the 12 jury members think that he is mentally ill or have other problems, so he does not agree to the death penalty. If the 12 jury members do not reach an agreement, they cannot be sentenced to death,” Cheng Shaoming Say.

He also said that many states in the United States have already abolished the death penalty. The state with the death penalty is also very cautious about the use of the death penalty. All death sentences must be reported to the US Supreme Court for a review of the death penalty, and this procedure is protracted. According to data from the US Death Penalty Information Center, 21 states have abolished the death penalty, including the Illinois state where the case is located. At the state level, 25 people were executed in 2018; at the federal level, the federal judicial system and the US military system had 62 pending prisoners, but since the federal death penalty was reinstated in 1988, the US government has only executed a total of Three people.

“After the death sentence, you can appeal, you can also reverse the case. The whole process is very long. It is necessary to execute the death penalty. It may take seven or eight years before and after the final result. It is also a great mental burden to the family members,” said Cheng Shaoming.

“Our goal has always been to bring Yingying home, unless we do this we will not get calm, and will not be assured”, the Chinese visiting scholar killed after being kidnapped #章 莹颖’s father Zhang Ronggao in the murderer After being sentenced to life imprisonment instead of death, they expressed disagreement but accepted the result and asked the defendant to unconditionally tell Zhang Yingying’s whereabouts so that they could bring their daughter home.

Mother’s tears

At the press conference after the sentencing judgment, Zhang Yingying’s mother cried, and her father read a Chinese state ment asking the defendant to unconditionally tell Zhang Yingying’s whereabouts.

“We understand that one or more jurors cannot make a decision on the death penalty for the defendant. Although we disagree with this result, we can accept that the offender will spend the rest of the life in prison, which will make up for our trauma in a certain sense. ,”He says.

In the sentencing phase, Zhang Yingying’s mother testified that she could not see her daughter marrying her boyfriend as planned.

“My daughter didn’t wear a wedding dress,” she said. “I really want to be a grandmother.”

Killing dead bodies

Federal assistant prosecutor James Nelson told the jury on the first day of the sentencing phase that Christensen not only brutally killed Zhang Yingying, but also hid her body and deprived her family of her for her in China. The opportunity for a formal funeral.

During the trial, Christensen’s ex-girlfriend, Terra Bullis, described Christensen borrowing her mobile phone when she participated in the vigil held for the chapter on June 29, 2017. The words “I am”.

Brice also said that Christensen told her that the people of the night came from him.

Christensen did not realize that she had a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) cable, and the FBI had begun investigating the disappearance of the chapter.

Later that day, Christensen described in detail how he raped and killed the chapter on his way home.

The next day, Christensen was arrested by the police. Earlier this month, his father, Mike Christensen, stood on the witness stand and thought that his son was facing the death penalty, and he burst into tears, saying that his son “can do too much.”

Defence lawyers also tried to prove that family alcoholism may be one of the reasons for his own problems. Defence lawyers said that Christensen’s mother and several other immediate family members were alcoholics.

Songzi Li/Editing Manager Translation by Philip Park

Announcement

[Urbana] Learn to tap dance this spring

It's never too late to learn to tap dance! Sign up for beginning tap dance classes that...

[Urbana] Free age-friendly kitchen demonstrations!

Urbana Park District-People age 50 and better get the chance to enjoy free cooking demonstrations this winter and spring at the...

[Urbana] Sunday Morning Bird Walks return March 1

Everyone is welcome to our free Sunday Morning Bird Walks at Anita Purves Nature Center beginning March 1. All walks begin...

Ebert Film Fest to feature remastered ‘Cotton Club,’ Farrelly brothers comedy

Francis Ford Coppola’s drama set in Harlem’s legendary Cotton Club during the 1930s – remastered, restored and with added scenes and...